“I Think I've Seen This Movie Before…And I didn't like the ending.”
There has been an air of despair as of late, where online these political spheres I tend to inhabit and congregate with others has seen a substantial shift in focus. A shift in focus away from the political, and more explicitly the culture and the questions of relationships and personal growth. This has been of course criticized by many both on the political left as well as fellow travelers in this sphere, that somehow there has been a regression to a time of talking about “cleaning our rooms” and the ever-so-common refrain of “become worthy.”
There is some of this on the surface which I find to be very valid, much of our current political problems that have been the focal point for many dissidents are still going on, whether that be the limitless illegal immigration that is basically subsidized by the state, whether in the US or UK, or the meat grinding march of progress through a digitized panopticon of surveillance and chiliastic globalism. Not much has been done in countering those things, a few stunts here and there in the US, although I have some hope for the widespread protests in the UK and Ireland.
Yet one has to ask “is there a reason that so many have transitioned from national politics and commentary to the local, personal and cultural?” There are a variety of answers to this, of which I will try to highlight some of the key points. This is both criticism but also an illustration of the perennial need to focus on the personal. After all, much of our current woes have tied a cinderblock to the accelerator, but that doesn’t mean ordinary people have stopped working or trying to get married. So let’s take a look at this shift, as it seems at the time of writing this the scene is more focused on the day to day of dating, religion, and self-worth.
Isn’t this just a little boring?
Even as I say this, perhaps boring isn’t the word to use. Yet I cannot help but find myself consuming less content, news, and reviews than at any point before during my time as The Prudentialist. This is in part because I want to spend time reading more, which has seen relative success, and also because I want to spend my time on things that I know I can actually do in my area whether that be my parish or city council meetings. For instance, I have taken the time to print out the substack posts of my colleagues and distribute them at my county GOP with some degree of success. The chairman seems to really like The Distributist, so there’s hope.
I think the sudden shift back to dating, aesthetics, culture, and self worth is that politics can seem rather demoralizing, and outright boring if your own life is in a rut. Despite the Dostoevsky style ghost or husk of a man that remains today of Jordan B. Peterson, he once managed to captivate millions (and set hundreds of thousands more down their political journey) on the simple message of self improvement, self-discipline, and getting into the mindset that is necessary for success. A mindset that includes mindfulness, long term planning, and having some self-worth. Those things are perennial, and people are still going to look for answers.
In a time where there are more and more young people, generation Z and what comes after are coming online searching for meaning, I am not surprised in the slightest that there has been a rehashed focused on culture, personal growth, and offering an alternative lifestyle vision that isn’t just polycules and debauchery. After all, the wages of sin is death, and shouldn’t want our fellow men to be converted and live? Not just in the Christian sense, but also to simply not engage in behaviors that are contribute to our current civilizational entropy. It will vary for some, but tradition serves as the answer to perennial problems, but Christ is the answer to eternal problems.
So if anything I’m not surprised when the media cycle rages on the same things that by the time feel obvious, to take a line from Auron MacIntyre, it’s not rocket science they just hate Western Civilization and the people who built it. I think this is where the self-discipline, or even my own concerns about being overly online to where seeing the same things day in and day out can cause a bit of demoralization. This isn’t a call to say you don’t have to harden yourself (Lord knows you do) but for many it is illustrative of a feeling of learned helplessness.
This is perhaps where criticism of the “online right” “e-right” or whatever parlance you like to use is valid, that a falling back to the cultural, social, and religious issues are a sign that hope is lost, or at the very least no one has the energy or plan to push forward and carry on the banner to fight on. However one could point out that this isn’t the case, in this push for self discipline and renewal, there is once again that hit-classic, establishment gatekeeping that we see between individuals like Adam Ellwanger against the likes of Raw Egg Nationalist, who has been explicit that his project is not just lifestyle but political especially on the concerns of an overly bureaucratized and corporatized food supply. Yet even now the usual back and forths feel somewhat trudged over, and that the “energy” that is there can be either funneled into worthwhile projects (whether be on your own individual self or a political project) or taken for a ride into a political ghetto that limits its exposure.
Partially this is par for the course of being online in a way that has you just as dependent on the algorithm as the algorithm is dependent on your engagement with it. Twitter puts you on a discursive high speed rail of information, takes, and factions with its own language and subculture that can throw you for a ride that you’re likely unprepared for, or will take the redpill eager to take it again and go down the rabbithole even further. However one cannot fully escape into the matrix, people still have to work, live a little, and maybe try and find someone that can live a little with them.
Podcasting as bad Politics
I had recently came across a tweet, which had simply said “Podcasting as Politics Has Been A Disaster for the Human Race.” To which I couldn’t help but agree. In an age where anyone and their mother can have a podcast, substack, youtube channel, undercover reporting and the like, one has to ask if this massive opportunity to turn yourself into a Commodity. Unlike a consumer identity you as the creator become a marketable commodity which subsumes your identity - and that’s what you define yourself as.
And even as I say this I can imagine one might be willing to call me a hypocrite, and to pluck out the podcasting plank out of my own eye. Fair enough, but at least I am active in my own local politics that I find it necessary to pre-empt this little bit. Don’t get me wrong, I am doing all the things that content creators do these days. Twitter, blog, videos, rants, merch, and I’m working on a book. I’m always uneasy about the parasocial relationship, because it’s no substitute for the real thing, no one wants to be lampooned like John Travolta in Fanatic. Yet there’s always that weird worry because if you lean into it correctly, either as someone who encourages his fandom or as someone who treats it with a loving scorn, it can be quite profitable. Now I don’t mind chasing that dollar, after all I have expressed in the past that I’d like to do this full time, but I am always reminded of James Chapter 3 and the stricter judgement faced on teachers. I think it’s just as applicable to “influencers” or “lifestyle activists” where if I am going to impart any kind of wisdom, I certainly hope its impact is positive and tangible.
Politics cannot be a set position of what you aren’t, or simply going over the current thing over and over every week. I think we see this in various essayists and streamers on our side. An example I like to cite is the regular occurrence on The Distributist’s weekly stream, “Broadcasts from Fiddler’s Greene” where a gentleman without fail every week sends in a little life update on his dating life and prospects as conservative Roman Catholic. People long for community, not just to be talked at or given a weekly report about how bad things are. To a degree, there is a plethora of content, both good and bad that demonstrates how easy it is to let this be one of the main things people consume. Even I watch less television (although the poor quality of today’s programming helps) and mainly listen to what my cohorts and colleagues say online and even then that’s going down.
I’ve enjoyed the “Less Podcasting, More Rod Casting” meme partially for this reason.
One cannot exist purely in the digital, and people are looking for those talking about how to survive, thrive, and grow in these dire times. Everything from farming, to dating advice has been a growing area of focus as people look for meaning, not to mention the issue of getting their own dunks when it comes to factional fighting on the right. This is the part and parcel complaint I see from more “serious” (take that as you will) about the growing factor of digital escapism and self-commodification accelerating via multi-track drifting. There is a vast degree of critique there but I am not sure for whom. On one hand yes, there is an absolute need for well established political actors to treat the issues of replacement migration, anti-white racism, the not-so-proxy war between the US and Russia, and more. Most people however, especially my audience (save for some of you, you know who you are) and are looking to people like me and countless others for answers.
Needless to say, pure podcasting and bloviating as politics makes for bad politics. The same for theology, as it can make for a bad reality depending on what you take up and pursue but that is for another video or essay. However, the fact that the ordinary person still has to live life in our strengthening postmodern hellscape still means that the personal and day to day is likely to be on the forefronts of everyone’s minds.
This Does Not Mean Abandon
This does not mean abandon all hope ye who enter here on this side of the right. Much has been discussed to a point where the focus on what was lost can leave one wondering what to do about the now. A nostalgic honeypot, as the current hierarchy that rules us runs on an order that is the inverse of the values that held it up. Meekness traded for gluttony and sloth, hard work traded for xenophilic outsourcing of morals and culture. In a strange twist of events, by the nature of the existing power structure and consensus making apparatus clearly in the hands of the left the dissident right is the subversive counter-prevailing force in the West.
I think to a large degree this means for many people, the ordinary individual who listens and reads this kind of stuff are looking for advice on lifestyle and the demoralizing deluge of memeplexes and media that one sees daily. However this does not mean abandon on the critical issues that lie before us that are both civilizational as well as spiritual. This means finding a martial, disciplined spirit that requires one to be de-atomizing and networking. Some of this has been discussed at least in the foundational stages in a stream I was part of a month or so back.
Additionally this doesn’t mean abandon politics, especially at the local level. I’ve said elsewhere but attending local city council meetings or being active in your community sets yourself in the right direction for what you can do with what’s right in front of you. I’ve seen more businesses, artistic ventures, non-profits and more join in the ranks of setting up (however fledgling) infrastructure that will help achieve political and cultural lens.
So Now What?
A question I have found myself asking and warning about for some time, is that if any kind of meaningful victory were to be accomplished on a macro or micro scale, one will inevitably ask “now what?” going forward. I think before getting to that, the question of “when will things get better?” also needs to be addressed, but thankfully there were a few good answers out there already.
Politics and Culture have a distinct relationship where one shapes the others, and vice versa but are both beholden to the agenda setters in power. Their culture, or animosity to the existing cultural superstructure (especially as an outsider or foreigner) will set politics and culture for the years to come with their tenure.
I have no promise that things will get better (I am no prophet nor do I have that gift) but finding means to maintain the traditions of our fathers and of our faiths will be paramount to maintain a way of living that can survive this. I’m not saying somehow we’ll become the Yukonites of Fitzpatrick’s War but clearly people are witnessing a hyperreal situation in our politics that everyone is scrambling for any sense of heritage. What makes it worse is that it manifests itself in the fakest and most extreme ways online where anyone can be anything including Dogs and Tsarists. Something I’ve noticed is that Jordan Peterson and other self-help “I Used To Be A Miserable F*ck” authors miss is that self improvement will never succeed in replacing the awful spirit of the age.
I think this ongoing focus of pop culture, dating advice, and the day to day is a sign of either waning energy (with a potential aura of defeatism) or that there is growing need for something more heartfelt. At the end of the day, cleaning your room isn’t going to change the world otherwise Peterson wouldn’t have had the dark night of the soul only to become a Daily Wire husk he would have become something else. Synthesis is desperately lacking, and I think that is maybe where I’m coming to a head here. Perhaps the rumination that could best put a point to this post is that the need to synthesize our traditions to the current political struggles of the age. I hope to make 2023 a place where I can write some of my own thoughts on how to proceed.
So let’s avoiding remaking the same movie.
Firstly Prude, thank you for the length and quality of this article you've put together!
I've wished more people would focus on this aspect in this little thing of ours; the avenue of self-improvement and the conversations around that. To begin I've not explicitly thought of this but I would have to agree that the introduction of streams/podcasts has not, on the whole, been beneficial to politics in general, getting to listen to different people bloviate about a given topic while interesting from a "where does this person come from?" perspective has to work hard to straddle the line of Bloodsports and to be meaningful constructive content. Moreover, with all of these podcasts and streams we generally lose focus on what's really happening, we, I think at least, become focused on a meta-politics of sorts. Someone did X/Y/Z, a bill is being discussed, some protest is ongoing, a certain leader said a certain thing and so on, at some point, this becomes nothing more than politics as entertainment birthed by cable networks like CNN/FOX.
I and the many other young men (and women?) in this sphere gain literally nothing from hearing any of this nonsense and concerning ourselves with it. In fact, I believe it is on the whole entirely detrimental for the young folks in our spheres to wade into these topics, we should really only be tangentially aware of them and not be consuming them as if they’re the latest marvel movie. Those of us who participate in local and state politics and can succeed at obtaining important positions (that recent story of the young man in Maine who’s a GOP chair(?) comes to mind) are the exception and can spend some more time being aware of this but even then much like I’ve said its a fine line between trying to affect politics and create politics so-to-say and just participating in the meta-politics of consuming content (renaissance *cough*). To quickly summarize this portion as it's not the main point of my comment, politics is something to worry about only if it directly matters to your job (as in you’re a position/leader in your local political party) and the rest of us are better off being slightly aware of the major happenings but merely re-focusing on ourselves and our immediate surroundings– time is valuable and as young men, we have practically infinite time so let's not WASTE it consuming useless politics we can practically do nothing about.
“Needless to say, pure podcasting and bloviating as politics makes for bad politics.”-- agreed.
Now to the main point: self-improvement. Self-improvement is something that I find has been really thrown by the wayside due to JP’s fall from grace recently but it is something still immensely important to every single individual in our movement (obviously I’m a big Self-improvement fan, so much so I named my YT channel: The Improooover). The concept, shortened to SI from here on out, has evolved its own meta, similar to that of podcasting but in no way as bad. My feeling is that SI has been foregone by folks in our space in favor of doom-posting/bloviating about politics and so on. With few exceptions, radLib immediately comes to mind and maybe AA’s shilling/writing counts as well, are there people in our spaces talking more personally about their stations in life.
I understand the value of anonymity and that importance but its not difficult to be careful with the details or to generalize certain things to make it impossible to detect identities so that we can actually have meaningful discussions about the things going on in our lives. We all recognize that we’ve got lots of younger folks in our spheres and in the same breadth we’re willing to recognize the plight of zoomers (and everyone else for that matter) in this digital panopticon (thanks Gio) but I hardly see anything (which may be my fault as I can’t really devote lots of time to staying in the know because of work and school): videos, streams, essays, what-have-you, about how the ‘leaders’ of our spheres are doing in their personal lives, their businesses and their work.
Dave does the Lord’s work reading that guy’s (Ben White?) super chats about his dating life (and also shilling the Scylldings– hopefully they do another meetup this year, I’d actually be able to make it!), it's such a minor detail in the grand scheme of the concepts that Dave talks about on his streams but I feel as though those comments are un/intentional goldmines. Sure it's great to know of Spengler and his cycles, the esotericism of Evola, and so forth but is it a net benefit to let this level of deep erudition dominate our spaces when people willing to donate money to leaders like Dave just want help with how to meet women?
I immensely value the scholarly pursuits of all of the members of this little thing of ours but I personally think, as an elder-zoomer, that we shouldn’t let these scholastic pursuits paralyze our group’s ability to lead people of my cohort. I would much more appreciate the folks in our spheres speaking of where they’re at in life, how they got the things they did and didn’t do, and should and shouldn’t have done. Our space is filled with engineers, geniuses, former/active military, artisans, scholars, professors, husbands, fathers, and so on yet, our discourse isn’t dominated by humans speaking about the lives they’ve lived but rather about irrelevant politics or deep knowledge found in out of print books.
Self-improvement is a major aspect of our movement as we’re dominated by men and women probably within the bracket of 15-40 at the prime stages to create exponential success, the success that would ultimately benefit our movement and positively guide our nations into the next millennium! We should be focusing on creating our own millionaires, billionaires, politicians, Military/government/private leaders, husbands/fathers, wives/mothers etc. We’ve all got such immense experience but I feel that it is vastly underutilized as of right now.
Thank you Prude for writing this article to help me put my disjointed thoughts to paper, maybe I’ll record a video on this to continue working through my thoughts.
“I think this ongoing focus of pop culture, dating advice, and the day to day is a sign of either waning energy (with a potential aura of defeatism) or that there is growing need for something more heartfelt.” I want meaningful relationships and knowledge to be shared and cultivated in this little thing of ours, politics and esoteric erudition are mere distractions.
Regardless, God Bless you and your family my friend.
Thoughtful piece. I think you are pointed in the right direction. I feel I am in a very similar space. Small ball. Too many want to hit home runs. Sometimes we just need to make contact with the ball. The little, local, real things. But also synthesis. I could write sermons and preach online. I have the training. But what is needed, as you say, is synthesis. Too much of the right is people grasping at things, hoping to make them work. But pulling together insights from scripture, Gregory of Palawan, Aquinas, Calvin, Burnham, Ellul, Schmitt and others into something of a new cohesive whole that can challenge the world of the current regime which includes much of the institution building and maintaining class from politics to the university to places like churches. There is a lot of dead wood to clear away. A lot of work to be done whether locally in the real world or in the Twitter/Substack/podcast world. Many of us are on the same journey thinking and feeling the same things and that can only be a good thing.