Discussion about this post

User's avatar
PromisesToKeep's avatar

Too many leftist interpretations of this film yapping about repressed sexuality and bodily autonomy. The real point here is that a severe spiritual error made in the very first scene, the inability to distinguish between the holy and unholy, leads to death. In Ellen Hutter’s desperate loneliness and sadness, she calls out for anything, doesn’t matter what, to come and save her. “Anything” answers, and she surrenders to it, leading to the tragedy of the rest of this film.

Thank you for a review with some actual insight, Prude.

Expand full comment
Take Your Medicine's avatar

Excellent review! Though I want to say that I think your "Chekov’s gun" criticism doesn't quite land for one reason: Egger's is emphasizing, just as you note about Christmastide, that the bustling city has only the trappings of religious faith, but all sincerity is gone.

Not once in the city is there ever a shot of a church (at least the interior); not once is there ever a clergyman consulted. The ONLY depictions of Christianity we get in the city scenes are minor ones like the cross pendant which is fidgeted with but never invoked. It's like there's a subconscious longing there for deeper meaning - a meaning readily available but never engaged. I think the focus on the pendant specifically was very deliberate to drive this point home.

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts